Showing posts with label better. Show all posts
Showing posts with label better. Show all posts

Friday, March 14, 2014

Galaxy Tab 3 T211 vs Canvas Tab P650 Which one’s a better budget tablet

Samsung and Micromax are in edge to edge competition as they are both currently the leading vendors in the Indian market. A lot of their gadgets are being compared to one another. Now Micromax has just launched its flagship tablet, the Canvas Tab P650 which will be up against the Tab 3 211 from Samsung.
Let us have a comparative look at the Samsung Galaxy Tab 3 T211 and Canvas Tab P650:

Micromax-Canvas-Tab

Design: The Galaxy Tab 3 T211 is about 9.9 mm thick and weighs 304 grams. While the Canvas Tab P650 is 9.6 mm thick but slightly heavier than the Galaxy Tab. But the Samsung offering has a better build quality so this one goes in favour of the Tab 3.

Display: The Galaxy Tab 3 T211 carries a touch display of 7 inches and a resolution of 1024 x 600 pixels where as the Canvas Tab P650 features an 8 inch display and 1024 x 768 pixels resolution. The Micromax unit is slightly bigger which might just work in its favour but the Samsung device comes with a better pixel density.

Processor: Galaxy Tab 3 T211 has been equipped with dual core processor of 1.2 Giga Hertz which pales in comparison to the Canvas Tab P650’s quad core processor of 1.2 Giga Hertz. And this where the difference might just come in. But the Samsung Tab 3 211′s processor is based on Cortex A9 architecture whereas the Canvas Tab is based on Cortex A7 architecture so expect somewhat similar levels of performance.

samsung-galaxy-tab-3-180713

 Operating System: Galaxy Tab 3 T211 functions on Android 4.1 Jelly Bean while the Canvas Tab P650 works on Android 4.2.1 Jelly Bean. And the Canvas offers a stock Android experience so this is one aspect where the Micromax offering has an upper hand.

Memory: Both the devices carry a RAM of 1 GB. Galaxy Tab 3 T211 offers internal storage of 8 GB and expandable storage of 32 GB. On the other hand, Canvas Tab P650 provides 16 GB of internal storage and 32 GB of expandable memory. And the Micromax Canvas Tab P650 wins once more.

Camera: Galaxy Tab 3 T211 features 3 mega pixel rear camera and 1.3 mega pixel front facing shooter. Micromax again wins with its 5 mega pixel primary camera and 2 mega pixel front facing shooter.

Connectivity Features: Both the tablets offer connectivity options, such as Bluetooth, Wi-Fi, micro USB, GPS and 3G. Galaxy Tab 3 T211 also provides DLNA and GLONASS. There’s a sim card slot as well for connectivity alongwith calling facility.

Battery: Galaxy Tab 3 T211 runs on a 4000 mAh battery while the Canvas Tab P650 works on 4800 mAh battery.

Our Take: Though these two devices come under the same price cap, however, differences in terms of features and specifications are hard to ignore. The Canvas Tab P650 looks better on paper but the Samsung devices have already proved their worth in terms of real world performance.
Read more »

Micromax Canvas 4 vs Karbonn Titanium S9 Which one is a better sub Rs 20 000 device

Micromax and Karbonn, both have almost similar kind of journey since their respective inception in the homeland. Both have gained significant success in the Indian smartphone market and are considered as neck to neck competitors. Hence, the competition between the recently launched Micromax Canvas 4 and Karbonn S9 is going to be very interesting. We are plotting here the comparative analysis of the two smartphones.

Micromax Canvas 4 specifications
· Android 4.2.1 (Jelly Bean) operating system
· 5 MP Secondary Camera
· 13 MP Primary Camera with Sony sensor
· GPRS, EDGE, 3G and Wi-Fi support enabled
· Android v4.2.1 (Jelly Bean) OS
· Dual SIM (GSM + GSM) with dual standby
· Expandable Storage Capacity of 32 GB
· 1.2 GHz Quad Core Cortex-A7 Processor
· 5-inch LCD HD Capacitive Touchscreen

micromax canvas 4

· Full HD Recording
· 2000 mAh battery
· 16 GB of internal storage space with up to32 GB expansion through micro SD card
Micromax Canvas 4 comes with anodized aluminum body which is not just robust but also looks very smart. The keys are made of aluminum and it feels quite premium and offers better feedback. It comes in Grey and White color. The device is priced at Rs 17,399 and with its amazing camera capability, screens size and battery power, it is set to look beyond its league.

While its 5 MP secondary camera works fantastic during Skype chat sessions, its primary camera can give beautiful panoramic views, if moved smoothly across the area. Its price economy is a factor that you can not ignore. This was the reason because of which the device got huge response during the pre-sale.

Karbonn S9 specifications
· 1.2 GHz Quad Core Processor
· 5.5 Inch HD IPS Touch screen Display
· Dual SIM Support
· 1 GB RAM, 16 GB internal memory with slot for extension up to 32 GB
· 13 MP Auto Focus Rear Camera With Flash
· 5 MP Front Facing Camera
karbon-s9

· 3G, Wi-Fi, GPRS, EDGE, Bluetooth and USB
· Android 4.2 Jelly Bean
· 2600 MAh Battery

This is the fourth launch under Karbonn’s mid-ranged smartphone under Titanium series which has done decently for the brand. Many have alleged that there is not much difference between Canvas 3 and 4. However, it is for the first time that Karbonn has come up with HD IPS screen for its smartphones and the quality of display looks much better than its predecessors.

The market price for the phone is Rs 19,990. To make the deal more interesting, the company is offering a free flip cover along with the purchase of this smartphone. On the specification front, it scores well over Canvas 4. Its battery life and bigger screen gives it an upper edge in the competition. Both devices use similar versions of Android, hence score the same on this front.
Read more »

Wednesday, March 5, 2014

Nokia Lumia 520 vs Sony Xperia M Which One is better buy

Nokia and Sony are two of the most famous manufacturers in the Indian smartphone market. They have time and again come up with great technology to keep its consumers loyal to their brand. To compete in the smartphone market Nokia has gone with its Lumia range which offers various Windows OS smartphones coming at different price ranges.

Nokia Lumia 520 India

On the other hand Sony has relied upon the Xperia range which again has a number of models to offer in all price ranges, this range works with the Android OS. Two budget phones of these manufacturers are the Nokia Lumia 520 and the Sony Xperia M.

Screen: Considering the price of both the phones let’s have a look at the features of both phones. The Nokia Lumia 520 has a 4 inch IPS LCD capacitive touchscreen with a pixel ratio of 480 x 800 pixels. The Xperia M comes with similar 4 inch TFT capacitive touch screen with a display ratio of 480 x 854 pixels. The screen of both the phones is scratch resistant.

Ram and Storage Options: The Lumia sports a 1 GHz Dual core processor supported by 512 MB of RAM, while the Xperia M carries a similar speed processor the RAM is 1 GB making it a slightly faster phone. The internal storage in Lumia is 8 GB and the same can be extended by 64 GB with the help of an external memory card.

The Xperia M has only 4 GB of internal memory and expandable external storage capacity of 32 GB. Both phones have the capability to connect to 2G as well as 3G networks. Thus both phones can access to high speed data networks also. In addition the phones can connect to Wi-Fi, USB and Bluetooth connections. The Xperia has an advantage over the Lumia in the fact that it supports NFC feature while the Lumia doesn’t. This however isn’t important as there are very few phones in the Indian market that support NFC.

Sony Xperia M

Camera: The camera of Lumia 520 is 5 MP and comes with autofocus and geo-tagging feature. There however is no flash in the Lumia 520. The Xperia M has a 5 MP camera with LED flash. HRD, autofocus, panorama and geo-tagging feature are also present in the Xperia.

Operating System: Another important differentiating factor between Lumia and Xperia are their Operating Systems. While the Lumia runs on the Windows 8 OS which has only a limited number of apps, the Xperia runs on the more popular Android OS which has huge number of apps and also can be subjected to experimentation unlike the Windows OS.

Battery and Other features: The Lumia has a 1430 mAh battery which offers a decent battery back-up. Nokia claims that the same is capable of providing 14 hours 40 mins back-up in 2G calling. The Xperia M on the other hand has a 1750 mAh battery, which is bound to provide more battery back-up than the Lumia one. However the different features of the phones may cause the battery back-up to go up and down.
A number of additional features follow both the phones while the Xperia M has a document viewer, the Lumia comes with a pre-installed Office for the phone which offers much more room for viewing and editing all kinds of documents. The usual SNS integration, Clock, Calendar etc are present in both the phones.
Price: While the Nokia Lumia 520 can be bought for a price of around Rs. 10,000, the Xperia M is available at around Rs. 13,000.
Read more »

Friday, February 28, 2014

Flash Versus Ajax the Better System

By: Frank J. Lucer

Flash was developed by Macromedia in 1996, making it one of the earliest design and style platforms still in use today. Developers use it to create animations and design and style an interactive encounter for users; ajax, on the other hand, may be loosely categorized as a collection of style methodologies. In contrast to Flash, it isnt vendor-specific.

There are other differences in between the 2 systems. Flash is delivered through a Player that is downloaded as a plugin to your browser; from the clients viewpoint, the process is seamless; the Player is already installed within nearly all existing browsers. Ajax doesnt demand a separate plugin. Instead, it is delivered through design specifications that are already acknowledged by the majority of internet browsers.

So, when creating new applications, which system should you use? Both pose advantages and possible disadvantages, many of which are much less clear-cut than you might believe. Beneath, well supply a birds eye view of both approaches. Our objective is to provide you an objective basis from which to select the most suitable system for your venture.

Advantages And Disadvantages To Using Flash

Flash is universal. As mentioned previously, almost all present internet browsers come with the plugin previously installed. That indicates your apps will perform effortlessly for the majority of users. Its pervasiveness also means the platform will proceed to enjoy solid support, both from the vendor and the designer community.

Another advantage is that various other design solutions produced by the vendor (i.e. Adobe) have been created to integrate Flash. There is a degree of cross-product efficiency, which is convenient if you use these other applications.

One of the drawbacks is that this system takes a significant amount of time to learn. Because it is such a powerful design tool, it includes design characteristics that raise the learning curve. This leads to an additional potential disadvantage: Flash applications can be effective, but only if the programmer is adept with his or her code. Often, apps are developed with inefficient code, which could bring a browser to its knees.

Advantages And Disadvantages To Using AJAX

Ajax is essentially an expansion of recognized internet advancement benchmarks (e.g. JavaScript, HTML, CSS, etc.). Like Flash, this suggests the platform may enjoy continued support in the programmer community.

An edge to utilizing Ajax is that the exchange of data between the users internet browser and the server on which your website is located is practically seamless. It occurs within the internet browser without interaction from the user; this all but eradicates the need to reload webpages. From the users viewpoint, the lack of reloading provides a quicker - and far more engaging - encounter.

One of the downsides to utilizing Ajax is that there is no way to sustain the modifications a user starts within the application; the altered page cant be saved to avoid losing the changes. There are techniques to reduce this effect, but the methods lie past the platform itself, and depend largely on the skill and imagination of the programmer.

Is It Necessary To Choose?

A frequent trap for designers is to think they have to choose in between Flash and Ajax when developing vibrant internet apps (RIAs) for a site. In truth, a blended strategy might be appropriate. A few applications are ideal applicants for Flash while others are properly suited for Ajax. Some apps can be created utilizing both platforms.

For example, an app designed with an interactive map and fast info filters might be best-served by marrying the two techniques. The animation section (i.e. interactive map) would be produced with Flash while the filters would be designed with Ajax.

Its important to realize that the two development systems seek to achieve the same end: supplying a vibrant, interesting experience for end users. In that regard, both provide worth

Resist the temptation to dismiss one or the other until you have measured your ventures design and style goals against each of them.

Read more »